I Disaggre if Final Examination will be continous

Name : Vidi Febrian. P

Major : Information System

Nim : 1122002011      

                            

                          I Disaggre if Final Examination will be continous

1. Function Of Final Examination

          This is the most make every student who followed the UN had the name "stress". What are we doing for years just determined his fate for hours. Very WRONG if a passing grade is one of the functions of the UN.

2. Indonesia consists of thousands of islands

          Java and Papua, facilities and infrastructure in Java are far superior to Papua. But the numbers remain the same graduation standards so normal that in Papua who do not pass a lot more than in Java. So very WRONG if UN made ​​a passing grade. The graduation standards should be determined by each region or determined by each school.

3. Learning to pass

          According to the UN functions as a passing grade, so students are required to study for a high score and pass. So that almost all students will probably forget a lot of lessons in high school when they were in college. At grade 12, especially in the 2nd half, just learning includes exercises with short-term goals: graduation, graduation 100%, the value of good UN. But not necessarily the value of the UN high 100% pure.

4. Final exam cheating

          This most often happens when the National Exam, Answer Key and Leakage Problem. The government is trying to address fraud in the UN. Still, there will always be cheating in the examination. And the negative impact on students industrious and lazy students.

I Agree If The National Examination Is Held, But There Is Modification

Nama: Teuku Fadhil Magistra

NIM : 1111001051

“I Agree If The National Examination Is Held, But There Is Modification”

Saya setuju dengan diadakannya national examination tetapi dengan adanya modification, karena jika national examination tidak diadakan, maka kita tidak dapat melihat tingkat kualitas pendidikan kita. Tetapi dalam faktanya dengan diadakannya National Examination ini juga tidak dapat menentukan  kualitas dari para siswanya karena kita lihat saja banyak soal-soal yang beredar sebelum national examination tersebut dimulai, dan jika sistem tersebut tidak segera dibenahi maka bakal banyak para calon-calon koruptor yang timbul. Maka dari itu national examination ini harus diadakan namun harus ada modifikasi pada sistem yang diterapkan, karena sistem yang lalu-lalu  dirasa belum maksimal untuk diterapkan. Sistem yang harus dibenahi salah satunya adalah sistem pengamanannya, karena dengan adanya sistem pengamanan yang ketat, maka akan sulit jawaban dari national examination ini untuk “jebol”, tetapi itu juga harus didukung dengan kesadaran diri dari pihak-pihak yang bersangkutan. Sistem dalam menentukan kualitas pendidikan siswa yang diambil juga tidak hanya ditentukan dengan national examination ini saja, tetapi nilai-nilai yang masuk seperti nilai perilakunya, nilai ujian-ujian di sekolahnya, dan nilai-nilai yang lain juga dapat dijadikan patokan dalam menentukan kualitas pendidikan siswa. 

I agree that national examination to be stopped

Nama:Triandi Sunarya

NIM:1122002002

Prodi:SIF 12

I agree that national examination to be stopped,  and from my perspective the reasons are:

1. The first thing to build and prepare from our young generation is moral. We knows cheating is like a cultures for some of us,and its like majority of us. Environment, behaviour, paradigm about which wrong which is right mostly causing it and thats the first thing to change from our country

 2. The solution provided by government for problems in each years of national exam isnt have a significant increasement especially in the last 3 years. Adding more packages, increase the standard mark will not stop cheaters and it will just give them more pressure because their morality and seriousness in school is very low.

3. Some country especially superior country could produce hi-quality human resource eventhough without national exam. But not only superior country, even evolve country such as filipina doesnt hold national exam but produce human resource that also compete with ours. Just because we are an evolve country and we got lack of resource and facility, it doesnt mean we just keep calm. What we need to start is a well organized plan,resource,and facility to build a better event to test the quiality of our human resouce to be compete.

4. National exam for minority i mean those who are serious in school, upholds the principles of which is wrong which is right is a n event to prove their skill and they are worthed, but unfortately  for majority (those who prefer to cheat) is just an event that giving them pressure, destiny that determined in a week,  an event to devote efforts for 3 years and eventhough they are succed it doesnt prove their quality at all.

5. what actually we need due to test the quality of our human resource is improving our generations maturity, hard skill, soft skill, and moral and in my opinion it depends on how we begin and continue. Because the first teacher is parents, and they build their childs character, parents must well prepared to implant a good character on their children, and people must work together to build a condusive environment for young generation to grow  up.

Kekacauan Ujian Nasional 2013 Harus Dievaluasi

Tezsa Aprilia
1111001060

Kekacauan pelaksanaan Ujian Nasional (UN) tingkat SMA dan SMP tahun ini tidak bisa diabaikan tanpa perubahan. Mengetahui kenyataan UN tingkat SMU di sebelas provinsi diundur lantaran keterlambatan pengiriman soal, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan langsung menuai bermacam kritikan. Dalam Rapat Kerja antara Komisi X DPR RI dengan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan kemarin, menghasilkan beberapa catatan kritis. Misalnya, Mendikbud didesak mempertimbangkan kembali syarat kelulusan dan masuk perguruan tinggi menggunakan hasil UN.

Bahkan anggota komisi juga meminta adanya audit investigasi oleh Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan dalam penyelenggaraan UN. Soal polemik UN, Pengamat Pendidikan menyarankan kepada pemerintah agar segera membuat penelitian untuk menilai kembali pelaksanaan UN secara menyeluruh. Hal itu penting untuk mengetahui di lini mana saja permasalahan itu terjadi.

"Menurut saya harus ada evaluasi total. Mulai dari DPR, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan, serta Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan” kajian ilmiah penting untuk mencari kelemahan sistem pelaksanaan UN. Hasil penelitian itu nanti berguna untuk menguak apakah sisi perencanaan, pencetakan, distribusi soal, atau pelaksanaan UN yang bermasalah.

Berdasar pengalaman, pelaksanaan UN setiap tahun memang tidak pernah bebas dari noda. Contohnya, ada saja kasus soal ujian tertukar di salah satu sekolah."Misalnya soal buat IPA masuk ke berkas IPS. Ini sudah biasa, bahkan dari tahun 1950-an," terangnya. Ketika persoalan itu muncul, maka pengawas ujian dituntut bertindak cepat membenahi masalah tersebut. Bahkan menurut dia, tahun ini di sekolah-sekolah yang tidak mengalami kendala pelaksanaan UN, sekitar 80 sampai 85 persen tidak bisa menjalani standar operasional prosedur pelaksanaan UN. "Namun, saat saya mengetahui ada provinsi yang pelaksanaan UN-nya mesti diundur, karena soal ujian terlambat, rusak, dan sebagainya, saya bertanya ada apa. Ini kekeliruan apa? Apakah soal perencanaan, pelaksanaan, atau evaluasi?,"

Namun demikian, kemelut UN tidak bakal mematahkan semangat para guru di tempat terpencil sekalipun. Guru tetap akan memperbaiki mutu pendidikan. Hanya saja, lanjut dia, ada perasaan di antara para pendidik yang mempertanyakan soal keabsahan soal UN. Lain soal jika Ujian Nasional tahun ini memang gagal dilaksanakan. Nah itu bisa saja mencederai semangat para pendidik.

UN adalah salah satu komponen dari beragam indikator buat mengukur tingkat pendidikan di Indonesia. Mutu pendidikan akan baik jika ditunjang kepemimpinan dan perencanaan yang baik.

National Exam should be banned

Sonny Santoso Wibowo

Why National Exam should be banned

1. Students' success in learning should be measured from what they have learned and their learning process, not by specific test.

2. The potential and character of Indonesian students are not the same.

3. Uneven school facilities and infrastructure in Indonesia.

4. Leakage and cheating always happens in National Exam.

5. Students are not motivated to study.

I want that national exam be modified

Ricky Yusuf Putra Pramana

1111001008

Universitas Bakrie

Fakultas Manajemen 2011

“I want that national exam be modified” Because I think that there are so many things that can be considered to be able to improve the quality of education in Indonesia. With the significant positive modification of National Examination from year to year,it is expected that the national examination to become a facilities in the field of education that really work according to the intent and purpose of the functions that previously planned. There are some elements of the National Exam which must be modified. This is my opinion about the modification of National Examination :

1. distribution Control system in Indonesia is bad, and the secrecy  of the exam paper  disturbed, this can be changed by external control, by the firms or educational organization in Indonesia, so within the normal distribution of the unscrupulous who commit fraud will feel fear and deterrent.

2. Provision of adequate facilities and infrastructure to be able to do a good education, teaching and learning. Because national examination have the same standards in all region in Indonesia, but the infrastructure is distributed unfairly, so the remote and backward areas will be left behind, rather than catch up the quality of education in the better areas.

3. Holding admissions process and training for teachers throughout the region. So with the changes to the basic system, the quality of education in Indonesia can be increased, and the National Exam was not an issue for the students in Indonesian anymore.

4. Government evaluation which obviously practiced in the field, resulting in the implementation of the national exam because not only the type of course that going bigger and bigger, but also  the repair system by the government is better and better and realized .

5. System of government control to the entire rayon of national exam. so there will be no agreement between the schools in the district and impact the implementation of the National exam to be held tight and discipline. After that the possibility of cheating in the national exam can be reduced or even eliminated.

So maybe my opinion would be important / not national exam held in Indonesia

I agree that UN to be modified

Rabiah El Adawiyyah

Student of SIF 2012

Bakrie university

 My opinion on Indonesian National Examination

Statement : “I agree that UN to be modified”

The reasons:

1.      Tha package which is available must be decreased, because with the mostly packages that are available now is not useful at all. As it won’t reduce the fraud that exist now.

2.      The exams questions that exist in the National Exam now must be changed to orally, not a written exam. Because it will reduce fraud and cheating among the governments and the students. It will be proved whether that children are really smart or not, and for sure save more time.

3.      If it possible, the UN changed to be UAS only, not as a national level, including the result of the UN, it’s not as good as it could be a reference for a student to pass the high school. Because maybe a smart child is sick or something, and loss of concentration, and his result is bad.

4.      The exams questions should not be too difficult, because it will be the benchmark of the students so that they take guidance outside of school. As it also was a waste of money, and that guidance will take the opportunity to earn money from such a guidance.

5.      Government should provide opportunities for students who don’t pass the examination subjects by allowing students to repeat the same subjects. Maybe if they don’t pass less than three subjects, they can repeat it. Don’t immediately become the benchmark of high school graduation. But if they don’t pass more than three subjects, it’s for sure they don’t graduate from the high school.