I agree if national exams removed from education

YABEDI PEDRISH

1122002006

FINAL EXAM

  I agree if national exams removed from education, I think the national exams more harm than good

The most important is

1.       because as to determine the quality of a student was not of a few subjects. With educational system it, This education system does not also boost achievement indonesia in the eyes of the world . then, after research conducted by the global league tables, Indonesia is the second-lowest educational system with mexico and brazil.

2.       teaches students to cheat, they are afraid of not graduating so justify any means to pass, not to teach good character but instead make the child know the extent of fraud that can be done.

3.       also improper grading system, so is detrimental if a student is achievement does not pass for forgetting to fill any of the data. when the asked goverment  about it, and just say because they are less careful, that's not been good reason for a minister.

4.       the quality of education has not been the same for each region.

5.       many acts of corruption, the funds provided for the national exams with billions still there is uneven distribution, if the funds are used to improve the education system, such as its facilities and laboratories for experimentation. will further help students.

6.        announcement of a national exam that can also bring misfortune.

after graduating, taught students to crime, as do street chaos, painting clothes, donated than throw

Better National Examination did not proceed

Nama: Yasinta

NIM: 1111001099

In my opinion, Indonesia, better National Examination did not proceed, because:

1)      Every child is unique. I think the basic lesson is necessary, but teachers must also consider the advantages of each student. with the national exam, students are required to master all subjects and tend to not focus on the lesson that he should have an interest and excel in it. Excess - excess students become less unnoticed because in the social environment a person who does not pass the national exam to say stupid, but if the excess in the noticed and given more motivation, this child will thrive.

2)       Students become depressed. Haunted by a sense of not passing the National Exam causes students lack confidence, do not believe what is taught by teachers and eventually cheat. This distress awoke from accumulated lessons to be learned, the additional hours and little time to relax. could have been a result of this distress, even good students can not answer questions well and ultimately did not pass.

3)       Three school years are not comparable with the only pass the National Exam. If education for 3 years only established through the National Exam, then the school is useless. Then disband just schools, let students learn at their own way. The important thing is if he felt his ability was enough, he could follow the National Examination and obtain a diploma from the state if they pass. It's easier and cheaper of course.

4)      Which perform selection should not the state but the market. The market of SMA is college, let those who do the selection. Home school graduating students will definitely get into trouble because their students will not pass the college entrance exams. While SMK is a world market for labor, which is not capable graduates will not get jobs. It is more fair because the judge based on market needs. That way students will not only pursue the National Examination only.

5)      In the test should not students but teachers and schools. during a student has not graduated from the school, the student is the responsibility of the teacher and the school. Better to select countries with good potential - future teachers. Not only selecting their knowledge but also their teaching and their attitudes. Countries should also establish a rule or system of teaching and school management. The rules are general rules that must be followed to prevent the teaching system performing well. it is also the state should tighten supervision on the school because the school is the very foundation of the nation's potential successor. What is taught to them that shaped their future.

I agree that National Examination to be stopped

Yulia Chaniago

Student of SIF 2012

Bakrie Univerity

Statement : “I agree that National Examination to be stopped “

The Reasons are :

1.       Education was not fun anymore. Students just crammed exercise questions facing un. Nothing more than a school tutoring is just getting good grades and no longer character. Children no longer trained creativity and imagination.

2.       UN that the end result will be used as the basis for selection into further education also does not guarantee fairness for students.

3.       UN result is also used as the only instrument for determining graduation. This is a mistake. How many students who do not pass the exam in for three years are high achieving students. This is an injustice to the students. Injustice is at the final stage will cause severe psychological impact for students who do not pass.

4.       Schools also eventually feel a responsibility to ensure the students' graduation associated with better school credibility with the large number of students who pass the examination. Often schools and teachers make every effort to include a variety of fraud to ensure students graduating in the UN.

5.       Finally the Indonesian education that is already on the educational model by Paulo Freire criticized as banking education, which is a model of education that is not critical because it is directed to domestication, domestication, and social adjustment to the reality of the state of oppression, will increasingly be at the alarming condition. Students just become robots, uncreative trash and with the emergence of a new target in the world of education that is passed in the UN. UN issues form given in multiple choice as well turn off the power of creativity and critical students, because it is full of memorizing (theory) and poor reasoning.

6.       UN will also be very burdensome for schools located in remote areas, disaster areas, conflict areas, and areas of poor quality of education is still low compared to schools in other areas. Lack of educational facilities, low quality of education, lack of qualified personnel and teachers led to the level of preparedness in the areas of education to hold UN also low. Moreover, the UN held impressed hastily, so do not give them the opportunity to prepare themselves better. As a result, the UN tends to discriminate against them, when compared with students from normal areas.

I Disaggre if Final Examination will be continous

Name : Vidi Febrian. P

Major : Information System

Nim : 1122002011      

                            

                          I Disaggre if Final Examination will be continous

1. Function Of Final Examination

          This is the most make every student who followed the UN had the name "stress". What are we doing for years just determined his fate for hours. Very WRONG if a passing grade is one of the functions of the UN.

2. Indonesia consists of thousands of islands

          Java and Papua, facilities and infrastructure in Java are far superior to Papua. But the numbers remain the same graduation standards so normal that in Papua who do not pass a lot more than in Java. So very WRONG if UN made ​​a passing grade. The graduation standards should be determined by each region or determined by each school.

3. Learning to pass

          According to the UN functions as a passing grade, so students are required to study for a high score and pass. So that almost all students will probably forget a lot of lessons in high school when they were in college. At grade 12, especially in the 2nd half, just learning includes exercises with short-term goals: graduation, graduation 100%, the value of good UN. But not necessarily the value of the UN high 100% pure.

4. Final exam cheating

          This most often happens when the National Exam, Answer Key and Leakage Problem. The government is trying to address fraud in the UN. Still, there will always be cheating in the examination. And the negative impact on students industrious and lazy students.

I Agree If The National Examination Is Held, But There Is Modification

Nama: Teuku Fadhil Magistra

NIM : 1111001051

“I Agree If The National Examination Is Held, But There Is Modification”

Saya setuju dengan diadakannya national examination tetapi dengan adanya modification, karena jika national examination tidak diadakan, maka kita tidak dapat melihat tingkat kualitas pendidikan kita. Tetapi dalam faktanya dengan diadakannya National Examination ini juga tidak dapat menentukan  kualitas dari para siswanya karena kita lihat saja banyak soal-soal yang beredar sebelum national examination tersebut dimulai, dan jika sistem tersebut tidak segera dibenahi maka bakal banyak para calon-calon koruptor yang timbul. Maka dari itu national examination ini harus diadakan namun harus ada modifikasi pada sistem yang diterapkan, karena sistem yang lalu-lalu  dirasa belum maksimal untuk diterapkan. Sistem yang harus dibenahi salah satunya adalah sistem pengamanannya, karena dengan adanya sistem pengamanan yang ketat, maka akan sulit jawaban dari national examination ini untuk “jebol”, tetapi itu juga harus didukung dengan kesadaran diri dari pihak-pihak yang bersangkutan. Sistem dalam menentukan kualitas pendidikan siswa yang diambil juga tidak hanya ditentukan dengan national examination ini saja, tetapi nilai-nilai yang masuk seperti nilai perilakunya, nilai ujian-ujian di sekolahnya, dan nilai-nilai yang lain juga dapat dijadikan patokan dalam menentukan kualitas pendidikan siswa. 

I agree that national examination to be stopped

Nama:Triandi Sunarya

NIM:1122002002

Prodi:SIF 12

I agree that national examination to be stopped,  and from my perspective the reasons are:

1. The first thing to build and prepare from our young generation is moral. We knows cheating is like a cultures for some of us,and its like majority of us. Environment, behaviour, paradigm about which wrong which is right mostly causing it and thats the first thing to change from our country

 2. The solution provided by government for problems in each years of national exam isnt have a significant increasement especially in the last 3 years. Adding more packages, increase the standard mark will not stop cheaters and it will just give them more pressure because their morality and seriousness in school is very low.

3. Some country especially superior country could produce hi-quality human resource eventhough without national exam. But not only superior country, even evolve country such as filipina doesnt hold national exam but produce human resource that also compete with ours. Just because we are an evolve country and we got lack of resource and facility, it doesnt mean we just keep calm. What we need to start is a well organized plan,resource,and facility to build a better event to test the quiality of our human resouce to be compete.

4. National exam for minority i mean those who are serious in school, upholds the principles of which is wrong which is right is a n event to prove their skill and they are worthed, but unfortately  for majority (those who prefer to cheat) is just an event that giving them pressure, destiny that determined in a week,  an event to devote efforts for 3 years and eventhough they are succed it doesnt prove their quality at all.

5. what actually we need due to test the quality of our human resource is improving our generations maturity, hard skill, soft skill, and moral and in my opinion it depends on how we begin and continue. Because the first teacher is parents, and they build their childs character, parents must well prepared to implant a good character on their children, and people must work together to build a condusive environment for young generation to grow  up.

Kekacauan Ujian Nasional 2013 Harus Dievaluasi

Tezsa Aprilia
1111001060

Kekacauan pelaksanaan Ujian Nasional (UN) tingkat SMA dan SMP tahun ini tidak bisa diabaikan tanpa perubahan. Mengetahui kenyataan UN tingkat SMU di sebelas provinsi diundur lantaran keterlambatan pengiriman soal, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan langsung menuai bermacam kritikan. Dalam Rapat Kerja antara Komisi X DPR RI dengan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan kemarin, menghasilkan beberapa catatan kritis. Misalnya, Mendikbud didesak mempertimbangkan kembali syarat kelulusan dan masuk perguruan tinggi menggunakan hasil UN.

Bahkan anggota komisi juga meminta adanya audit investigasi oleh Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan dalam penyelenggaraan UN. Soal polemik UN, Pengamat Pendidikan menyarankan kepada pemerintah agar segera membuat penelitian untuk menilai kembali pelaksanaan UN secara menyeluruh. Hal itu penting untuk mengetahui di lini mana saja permasalahan itu terjadi.

"Menurut saya harus ada evaluasi total. Mulai dari DPR, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan, serta Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan” kajian ilmiah penting untuk mencari kelemahan sistem pelaksanaan UN. Hasil penelitian itu nanti berguna untuk menguak apakah sisi perencanaan, pencetakan, distribusi soal, atau pelaksanaan UN yang bermasalah.

Berdasar pengalaman, pelaksanaan UN setiap tahun memang tidak pernah bebas dari noda. Contohnya, ada saja kasus soal ujian tertukar di salah satu sekolah."Misalnya soal buat IPA masuk ke berkas IPS. Ini sudah biasa, bahkan dari tahun 1950-an," terangnya. Ketika persoalan itu muncul, maka pengawas ujian dituntut bertindak cepat membenahi masalah tersebut. Bahkan menurut dia, tahun ini di sekolah-sekolah yang tidak mengalami kendala pelaksanaan UN, sekitar 80 sampai 85 persen tidak bisa menjalani standar operasional prosedur pelaksanaan UN. "Namun, saat saya mengetahui ada provinsi yang pelaksanaan UN-nya mesti diundur, karena soal ujian terlambat, rusak, dan sebagainya, saya bertanya ada apa. Ini kekeliruan apa? Apakah soal perencanaan, pelaksanaan, atau evaluasi?,"

Namun demikian, kemelut UN tidak bakal mematahkan semangat para guru di tempat terpencil sekalipun. Guru tetap akan memperbaiki mutu pendidikan. Hanya saja, lanjut dia, ada perasaan di antara para pendidik yang mempertanyakan soal keabsahan soal UN. Lain soal jika Ujian Nasional tahun ini memang gagal dilaksanakan. Nah itu bisa saja mencederai semangat para pendidik.

UN adalah salah satu komponen dari beragam indikator buat mengukur tingkat pendidikan di Indonesia. Mutu pendidikan akan baik jika ditunjang kepemimpinan dan perencanaan yang baik.

National Exam should be banned

Sonny Santoso Wibowo

Why National Exam should be banned

1. Students' success in learning should be measured from what they have learned and their learning process, not by specific test.

2. The potential and character of Indonesian students are not the same.

3. Uneven school facilities and infrastructure in Indonesia.

4. Leakage and cheating always happens in National Exam.

5. Students are not motivated to study.

I want that national exam be modified

Ricky Yusuf Putra Pramana

1111001008

Universitas Bakrie

Fakultas Manajemen 2011

“I want that national exam be modified” Because I think that there are so many things that can be considered to be able to improve the quality of education in Indonesia. With the significant positive modification of National Examination from year to year,it is expected that the national examination to become a facilities in the field of education that really work according to the intent and purpose of the functions that previously planned. There are some elements of the National Exam which must be modified. This is my opinion about the modification of National Examination :

1. distribution Control system in Indonesia is bad, and the secrecy  of the exam paper  disturbed, this can be changed by external control, by the firms or educational organization in Indonesia, so within the normal distribution of the unscrupulous who commit fraud will feel fear and deterrent.

2. Provision of adequate facilities and infrastructure to be able to do a good education, teaching and learning. Because national examination have the same standards in all region in Indonesia, but the infrastructure is distributed unfairly, so the remote and backward areas will be left behind, rather than catch up the quality of education in the better areas.

3. Holding admissions process and training for teachers throughout the region. So with the changes to the basic system, the quality of education in Indonesia can be increased, and the National Exam was not an issue for the students in Indonesian anymore.

4. Government evaluation which obviously practiced in the field, resulting in the implementation of the national exam because not only the type of course that going bigger and bigger, but also  the repair system by the government is better and better and realized .

5. System of government control to the entire rayon of national exam. so there will be no agreement between the schools in the district and impact the implementation of the National exam to be held tight and discipline. After that the possibility of cheating in the national exam can be reduced or even eliminated.

So maybe my opinion would be important / not national exam held in Indonesia

I agree that UN to be modified

Rabiah El Adawiyyah

Student of SIF 2012

Bakrie university

 My opinion on Indonesian National Examination

Statement : “I agree that UN to be modified”

The reasons:

1.      Tha package which is available must be decreased, because with the mostly packages that are available now is not useful at all. As it won’t reduce the fraud that exist now.

2.      The exams questions that exist in the National Exam now must be changed to orally, not a written exam. Because it will reduce fraud and cheating among the governments and the students. It will be proved whether that children are really smart or not, and for sure save more time.

3.      If it possible, the UN changed to be UAS only, not as a national level, including the result of the UN, it’s not as good as it could be a reference for a student to pass the high school. Because maybe a smart child is sick or something, and loss of concentration, and his result is bad.

4.      The exams questions should not be too difficult, because it will be the benchmark of the students so that they take guidance outside of school. As it also was a waste of money, and that guidance will take the opportunity to earn money from such a guidance.

5.      Government should provide opportunities for students who don’t pass the examination subjects by allowing students to repeat the same subjects. Maybe if they don’t pass less than three subjects, they can repeat it. Don’t immediately become the benchmark of high school graduation. But if they don’t pass more than three subjects, it’s for sure they don’t graduate from the high school.

I want that national exam be modified

PANJI PAHLEVIE

1111001046

I want that national exam be modified

The reason are:

·         Because many cheating in the implementation of national exam so the government have to repair that system

·         The point of national exam should be compare for SNMPTN/SBMPTN

·         Safety increase the text of national exam

·         Repair the operational system of national exam like timing and completing all about that

·         Compare the point of national exam with another exam before for requirement for graduated

I agree that UN to be stopped

Muhammad Reza Pradana – 1112002003

Information System, Bakrie University

I would not use the theory of evaluation in UN discuss because apparently overlooked in our educational system. I would use the words that are easily understood by anyone, even though elementary students.

Observed events in the world of education, then there are 4 reasons why the UN must be removed.

The reasons:

1.   Learning in 6th grade, 9 junior high schools, and 12 high school especially the 2nd half is just about the exercises with short-term goals: graduation, graduation 100%, the value of good UN, could SMP / SMA favorites. Is our children will be equipped to live in a community with only the ability to memorize material and test work on the problems. Parents, principals, department heads, district heads and governors are proud if students scored high UN and pass 100%, but how teachers and children to stress to prepare the UN.

2.  The amount of fraud committed by either an individual, a group of students, as well as the tersistem of the school, perhaps even office with a reason to pass 100%, so that schools look good, so that principals and department heads are not ashamed.

3.   Chaotic implementation of the UN. I need not discuss here, please enjoy the news.

4.  The major funding for UN projects worth making UN will continue to be implemented for the welfare of ministers, heads of agencies, the UN committee, independent of the university supervisor, is talking about, and printing partner.

Now is the right moment to remove the UN which is intended for the welfare of some unscrupulous officials and fun at the expense of students and teachers on the pretext see the quality of education in Indonesia.

I want that National Examination be modified

Monica Agustina

Sistem Informasi 2012

Universitas Bakrie

My opinion on education National Examination (UN) :

I want  that National Examination be modified.

The reason :

·         Type of exam in National Examination should be modified and changed to essay not only  multiple choice.

·         If the exam only multiple choice, the students can not be declared their mind and capabillity.

·          Examination is important to evaluate the skill of students but usually students are wrong on their answer in examination because only one chance but in essay examination they can write their mind.

Indonesia Awam: UN, Pencerdasan Bersyarat atau Pemaksaan?

Tri Ade Feriyanto

1111001072

Bangga, melihat daftar peringkat di papan pengumuman, media cetak, televisi, atau internet—bahkan suara-suara gemuruh dari tetangga dan teman sekolah tentang keberhasilan menyelesaikan Ujian Nasional (UN) dengan hasil “memuaskan”. Ya, benar jika yang demikian adalah karakter Anda, adik Anda, sepupu atau anak Anda—Anda juga dimungkinkan untuk ikut merasa bangga (dengan berbagai bualan). Akan tetapi, bagaimana dengan mereka, para peserta UN yang was-was ketika mendengar kabar bahwa terjadi penurunan kelulusan pada tahun ini, terjadi perubahan sistem pembagian naskah soal (20 paket atau lebih)? Dan tidak dapat dipungkiri kenapa harus ada penyesalan menjadi seorang pelajar yang pada titik akhir tidak boleh menentang pencanangan keberlangsungan UN. Justru bagi para teladan pelajar, memastikan bahwa para pelajar diharuskan terus tumbuh dengan disuguhkan latihan-latihan soal pelajaran, bahan ajar yang berbasis silabus berintegrasi, atau mengabdi sebagai anak yang rajin dengan menghabiskan banyak waktu di sekolah ketimbang bersama keluarga?

Bukankah UN menciptakan suasana yang mensyaratkan para pelajar untuk bertindak akademis, sistematis dan konseptual terhadap kecerdasan mereka? Membicarakan tentang ketatnya pengawasan UN, tidak ada persamaan pentingya dengan mengupayakan kecurangan untuk mendapat bocoran soal. Seperti yang sudah umum terjadi di Indonesia, dewasanya banyak orang memanfaatkan sisi pengawasan yang ketat untuk dijadikan ladang bisnis. Kenapa bisa? Bukan, kenapa tidak bisa? UN menuntut para pelajar mengenali jati diri dan kepercayaan diri. Beberapa sekolah di Indonesia pasti menerapkan hal yang mendukung kecerdasan mental dan spiritual siswa. Hal ini, ditujukan bagi pentingnya rasa inisiatif diri siswa untuk membelenggu sifat tidak jujur. Secara sederhana, apa yang perlu dikhawatirkan oleh para pelaku jujur? Berlaku tidak jujur.

Namun, jika mengulas ulang pembahasan mengenai penting atau tidaknya UN di Indonesia dengan sudut pandang terbatas yang dimaksudkan agar tidak ada unsur pemaksaan dalam pelaksanaan UN. Melihat kacamata siswa sebagai peserta UN, pantaskah mereka menolak adanya UN? Seberapa besar kontribusi hak mereka terhadap program aspirasi Kementrian Pendidikan? Mengapa mereka dilayani dengan cara yang meraka secara mayoritas menerima tetapi terpaksa? Mungkin, pertanyaan ini sangat tepat sekali menjadi bahan penyudutan kepada Menteri Pendidikan dan jajarannya—pasca UN Tahun 2013 yang baru beberapa minggu dilaksanakan (terhitung dari 5 Juni 2013) di Indonesia. Karena, pada dasarnya media sebagai pemberi informasi secara langsung telah membawa suatu nilai yang menciptakan sudut pandang masyarakat kepada kinerja pemerintah tentang pengaturan pelaksanaan UN—yang berlangsung “ricuh” akibat kurangnya koordinir dan pengawasan dari pusat.

Semua orang bisa bayangkan, pada tahun 2011, 2012 atau pada tahun sebelumnya diketahui naskah UN mengalami kebocoran (secara halus). Apakah hal ini tidak disadari pemerintah sebagai bahan evaluasi yang memungkinkan untuk diadakan perubahan sistem? Tentu saja disadari. Tetapi, bersikeras untuk terus memperjuangkan kelahiran UN dengan melakukan ”improvisasi” besar-besaran. Tetapi, terlihat kah peran teknologi dalam hal ini? Ada, hanya sekedar media komunikasi (pasti). Tetapi, tidak kah pemerintah memahami kondisi mutu sekolah-sekolah di Indonesia, kualitas sumber daya manusia seperti guru dan siswa di seluruh sekolah di Indonesia? Diperhatikan, walaupun tidak semuanya masuk dalam statistik.

Sungguh pembahasan tentang kesalahan pemerintah dapat mewakili hak siswa di Indonesia untuk menolak UN. Dan inilah Indonesia awam. Suatu pendekatan dari pemikiran sederhana masyarakat Indonesia. Ketika diminta untuk menjawab pertanyaan “perlukah diadakan UN di Indonesia?”—tanpa kicauan mereka (Indonesia awam) menjawab, tidak perlu. Sebagian dari mereka melihat anak-anak mereka pergi meninggalkan rumah dan “membuang” banyak waktu di sekolah, tempat bimbingan belajar dan rumah teman untuk menyelesaikan soal-soal UN lawas. Inilah keprihatinan para Indonesia awam ini tentang karir anak-anak mereka di masa depan. Sedangkan, lebih dari sebagian Indonesia awam berpikir secara rasional bahwa memberikan izin kepada anak-anak untuk mengasah otak dengan cara mengurangi jam bersama keluarga adalah pilihan untuk mencerdasakan anak-anak (agar lulus UN dan menjadi bahan pembicaraan di acara arisan, pengajian).

Tidak lain, hal tersebut di atas telah tersangkut paut dengan kepentingan pribadi. Jelas kenyataanya terjadi suatu konversi perilaku anak-anak pada saat sebelum dan sesudah UN.

Bahasan ini, secara sengaja membawa pendekatan psikologi untuk meredam aksi keras peniadaan UN di Indonesia.

Ditinjau dari segi kerelatifan pendapat, UN merupakan suatu ancaman yang memaksa para pelajar untuk belajar lebih giat dan membuktikan garis ketegasan dari dalam diri para pelajar itu sendiri. Para pelajar tidak harus bersikeras menentang perubahan dalam sistem pelaksanaan UN (belum ada sampai saat ini)—setidaknya berlaku jujur dalam setiap kesempatan adalah nilai utama untuk meraih ketidakkhawatiran dalam menyambut UN. Meskipun pemerintah berlaku salah pada penerapan sistem.

Indonesia awam akan berkomentar tentang buruknya sistem pendidikan di Indonesia, dengan pandangan keawamanan mereka. Tetapi, tetap menerima adanya pelaksanaan UN. Menteri Pendidikan bertanggung jawab atas kelalaian tugas para staffnya, karena memegang wewenang mutlak. Para pengamat pendidikan melihat kelemahan sistem pendidikan di Indonesia sebagai kesempatan untuk mempelajari kembali nilai-nilai yang tertinggal dalam peraturan pemerintah. Dan para orang tua mendidik anak-anaknya untuk terus belajar dengan tidak hanya terpacu pada silabus suram itu. Yang secara otomatis dapat dipahami para pelajar sebagai target utama dalam bersekolah.

Dengan begitu, adanya kekurangan dalam sistem pendidikan di Indonesia—menjadikan Indonesia awam menarik kembali ucapan mengenai pemaksaan dan pencerdasan bersyarat.

I want that National Examination be modified

Ikram Alifkhan

1122002010

I agree with the extinction of National exam for student, BUT I want it to be modified :

·       I don’t agree about the National exam percentages, it is stated that the mark of the National exam is 60% and 40% is from the School examination, I want it to be 50%, so it will be fair enough

·       I want  a re-examination held again, because earlier the re-examination was abolished due to the percentages of a graduation ( 60% National exam & 40% school examination )

·       Increase the graduation standard, but make the exam easier

·       Heightened the control when the exam held, not only form the teacher and school, but also the government

·       Decrease the exam package, so that the control will be easier to maintain

I agree that national examination to be stopped

Iin Nur Yurinda

1111001052

Management

My opinion on indonesia national examination (UN)

I agree that national examination to be stopped, because

1.      Many corruption in the education fund national exam

Ø  Di dalam pelaksanakan ujian nasional banyak sekali terjadi penyelewengan dana pendidikan yang di lakukan oleh pihak pemerintah

2.      Because national examination  makes down mentally of student 

Ø  National Exam disturb the child's metal, so that children motivated to learn to memorize in order to carry out the national exam, the child should absorb that learning in school is not just memorizing lessons for national exam

3.      graduation is the right of all students

Ø  The right of all students who have studied for 3 years at the school is given graduation

4.      Every child is unique

Ø  The ability of a child is different from the others child  so that not be  same align with the national exam

5.      Not fair to all students

Ø  Because each child was studied for 3 years at school and only in specified in 4 days, which determine the ability of  student is the teacher and then teacher guide learning fo the student, for me  unfair national exams that determine if the graduation is the state should be teaher which determine the student

UN, Dilanjutkan dengan Beberapa Perubahan

Hasan Hasbullah

1111001009

Menurut saya ujian nasional tetap perlu dilanjutkan, namun  dengan beberapa perubahan.

1.       Jangan jadikan Ujian nasional sebagai indicator utama kelulusan. Kelulusan seorang siswa jangan hanya diukur dari nilai ujian nasional saja. Perlu digabungkan dengan indicator – indicator lain seperti nilai rapot dan sebagainya, jadi siswa tidak akan merasa perjuangan mereka bersekolah selama tiga tahun hanya ditentukan oleh beberapa hari ujian nasional.

2.      Ujian nasional dilaksanakn desertai dengan ujian sekolah. Dua ujian yang berbeda akan membebani psikologi peserta pendidikan karena biasanya ujian sekolah dan ujian nasional diselenggarakan dalam kurun waktu yang hampir sama. Mungkin lebih baik jikia penyelenggaran ujian nasional didalamnya sudah memuat ujian sekolah, jadi siswa hanya melakukan ujian satu kali.

3.      Soal ujian nasional berbeda antara daerah satu dengan yang lain. Hal ini menandakan adanya perbedaan kualitas pendidikan antar daerah. Perbedaan kualitas pendidikan seperti ini harus dirubah terlebih dahulu agar masing – masing daerah memiliki kualitas atau standar pendidikan yang sama. Jika hal ini sudah dapat dilakukan maka pengadaan ujian nasional dapat lebih adil.

4.      Operasional atau pelaksaan ujian nasional perlu dirubah. Naskah soal dibawa dari pusat dalam bentuk hard copy ke seluruh pelosok Indonesia dan dilaksanakan dalam hari yang sama karena dikhawatirkan terjadi kebocoran. Namun yang disayangkan disini jika terjadi hal – hal yang tidak diduga seperti kecelakaan pada kendaraan pembawa naskah soal, maka  langsung terjadi crisis. Dan dari kejadian beberapa waktu lalu, dibutuhkan waktu yang tidak sebentar untuk menyelesaikan kasus seperti ini. Teknologi harus diterapkan dalam kasus ini, seperti penggunaan naskah soft copy dan didistribusikan dengan sistim yang lebih modern.

I want that national exam be modified

Giulio Putra Sotarduga

LEADERSHIP

Bakrie University | 1111001079 | Management

“I want that national exam be modified”

Because, I think that the national exam held by the government is still very bad. For example, the distribution of the national exam question paper late, the lack of confidentiality national exam sheets and many other. If the implementation of the national exam still held with that problem, could impact on the quality of education in this country. I am a person which cares about the quality of education in this country, have ideas to modify the shortcomings in the government held a national exam every year, modifications are:

1. In each region, the level of complexity of the national exam is still a lot different because of the lack of quality education in all remote areas, for example the quality of teachers, school facilities, books, and other. Than, the government must be able to bring about change in the quality of education throughout region, by way of teacher selection, teacher training and the provision of facilities.

2. Frequent delays in distribution of the national exam sheets throughout Indonesia especially in remote areas, to be one of the main constraint in the implementation of national examinations. Than, the government should be more tight in monitoring the distribution of the national exam sheets be printed by printing companies throughout the region

3. Issues on the national exam sheet leaks and rampant sales nasioanal exam answer key to the often heard and become one of the major problems in the implementation of the nasional exam. Than, the government should cooperate with the police and the military in monitoring distribution, until sheets ready for the national exam was done by students.

I Want That National Exam be Modified

ARYA DIKARA (1111001034)

UNIVERSITAS BAKRIE

Manajemen 2011

I want that national exam be modified, because I see the phenomenon in Indonesia that after the implementation of the national exam, very often we hear the news that many students who do not pass and would upset of the national exam. Therefore I think there should be a national exam modifications, modifications are:

1. The government must be able to bring about change in the quality of education throughout Indonesia, by way of teacher selection, teacher training and the provision of facilities.

2. Government should enable our country to be competent with neighboring countries, especially in terms of education because education is closely linked with economic growth. This modification can be done by continuing to raise the standard of national exam grades in Indonesia accompanied by the increase in the quality of education in Indonesia

3. The government should be able to maintain confidentiality of exam paper better than before, and the member that strict rules and doing a violation and spread of questions and answers can be given appropriate punishment.

I agree that National Examination to be stopped

Andi Georgina Sandra Putri

Studentn of SIF 2012

Bakrie University

Statement : “I agree that National Examination to be stopped “

The Reasons :

1.      National Examination just wasting money away, because of some the  budgets which is worth hundreds of billions but the reality on the ground of the UN organizers is not getting better.

2.      National Examination become a ghost for students, because the measurement in measuring graduation is within 4 days, while students have worked hard for 3 years during high school.

3.      National Examination trapped teachers, students, and parents that the goal of learning is preparation for the future.

4.      National Examination is tend to compare between students, school distiricts, and even state not active the changes that occur in each group.

5.      National Examination also became accessor student’s achievement through numbers and standardized tests , while there is still much things that can be a special assessment for the students than the National Examination.